Guccio Balena
The DecameronGuccio Balena is Fra Cipolla’s servant and the comic embodiment of negligence in the episode of the stolen relic. Known also as Guccio Imbratta and Guccia Porco, he is presented through his master’s catalogue of defects and, more decisively, through the gap between the duty entrusted to him and the distractions he chooses instead. Fra Cipolla leaves him to guard the baggage; Guccio abandons it for the kitchen. That lapse helps turn a promised display of a sacred feather into a public test of the friar’s ingenuity.
Identity and Characterization
Fra Cipolla jokes that Guccio possesses nine faults, each so damaging that even one would ruin the worth, wit, and holiness of a figure as eminent as Solomon, Aristotle, or Seneca. The list makes Guccio a liar, a slovenly man, and a slugabed; disobedient, neglectful, and ill-bred; overweening, foul-spoken, and a dunce. His master adds that there are other minor failings too numerous to discuss. The extravagant comparison is comic, but its practical force becomes clear when Guccio is charged with protecting the baggage and fails to do so.
Fra Cipolla singles out a further absurdity in Guccio’s habits: wherever he goes, he wants to take a wife and hire a house. His large black, greasy beard feeds his vanity; he imagines that every woman who sees him falls in love with him, and, as his master’s joke has it, he would pursue them all. His self-image is not grounded in his appearance or conduct. The narrative instead shows him as a man whose confidence and pursuit of women are matched by little discernment or restraint.
His failings also make him an intrusive servant. Fra Cipolla says that no one can speak with him privately without Guccio insisting on hearing his share. If anyone asks the friar a question, Guccio is so anxious that his master might not answer that he supplies a yes or no himself, according to what he thinks suitable. The joke establishes both his presumption and his habit of interfering; when the more consequential test arrives, however, he does not protect his master’s possessions.
Appetites and Self-Presentation
At the inn, Guccio is meant to watch Fra Cipolla’s belongings, especially the saddle-bags containing the sacred object. Instead, the kitchen draws him away. He is especially susceptible to the prospect of a serving-wench, and the narrator describes him leaving the room and its baggage as eagerly as a vulture swooping on carrion. His attention settles on Nuta, the inn’s cookmaid, while the things he has been told to guard are left to themselves.
Guccio courts Nuta with extravagant claims. He says that he is by rights a gentleman, possesses more than nine million florins, and has still more to give away. He promises to clothe and adorn her anew and rescue her from her present situation, presenting himself as a source of better fortune despite having no evidence of the wealth he boasts of. His claims contrast sharply with his actual appearance: a greasy bonnet, a torn and patched doublet marked with dirt, and broken shoes with unsewn hose. The contrast makes his seduction a performance of imagined status, not a credible account of his means.
His attention to Nuta is sustained even by circumstances that might interrupt it. It is August, yet he sits by the fire to talk with her; he has drunk enough water for his belly to swell, and later arrives out of breath when Fra Cipolla summons him. The details keep the episode’s bodily comedy tied to its practical consequences: Guccio’s appetite for conversation and his concern with his own pleasures leave the baggage unguarded.
The Relic and the Failure of His Duty
Fra Cipolla had expressly ordered Guccio to take care that no one touched his belongings, with particular attention to the saddle-bags containing the sacred things. While Guccio lingers in the kitchen with Nuta, two young men enter the friar’s open chamber. They find the casket holding what Fra Cipolla had presented as the Angel Gabriel’s feather, remove the parrot’s tail-feather inside, and fill the casket with coals. They then leave the room without being seen. Guccio neither prevents the theft nor discovers the substitution before the public display.
The villagers of Certaldo have been promised a sight of the relic, and word of the coming exhibition brings a large crowd to the burgh. After mass and dinner, Fra Cipolla sends for Guccio and orders him to bring the saddle-bags and ring the bells. Guccio tears himself away from the kitchen with difficulty, then reaches the church out of breath and begins ringing as commanded. His return is late and physical rather than vigilant: he performs the task of summoning the crowd, but the earlier failure that endangered the display remains undiscovered.
Consequences and Narrative Function
Before the assembled villagers, Fra Cipolla solemnly prepares to show the relic. He recites the Confiteor, lights two torches, removes his bonnet, delicately unwraps the casket, and opens it. Finding coals where the feather should be, he does not suspect Guccio of having played the trick, judging him incapable of such an undertaking. Nor does he blame him for allowing another person to interfere. Instead, he silently reproaches himself for entrusting his belongings to someone he knows to be negligent, disobedient, careless, and forgetful.
Guccio’s failure therefore shapes the scene without making him its clever agent. The two young men steal and substitute the object; Fra Cipolla supplies the quick-witted public response. Guccio’s role is the careless interval that makes their prank possible. His self-importance in the kitchen stands against the real responsibility he neglects, while the friar’s sharper judgment of his servant retrospectively confirms the catalogue of faults. Through that contrast, Guccio becomes more than a target of comic description: his appetites provide the practical cause of the crisis, even as Fra Cipolla’s performance turns the crisis into a display of resourcefulness.